
The McSweeney's Book Club has already paid for itself.



Maybe I'm out of touch, out of practice with the modern short story. But at the end of the stories you aren't given hope about the state of fiction. It is easy to see why people stay with the classics, why people aren't sure why they should read anymore. The monotonous, intelligent, austere, polished prose doesn't lead the reader to new discoveries, instead it leaves him confused. I realize that, after reading this, that it sounds like I hate this book. Not true. I like it. I like the challenge. I would read more by Heti. It is a book that does not comfort. It does not provide conclusive, moral endings. In fact, the goals it often seems to deliberately confuse. But then you return to them, and you might possibly think: how curious, how interesting, how nervy. Maybe it's the same reason why I got tired of John Barth or never really began liking Donald Barthelme. Maybe it's a reaction to how things aren't nice and tidy anymore, that we aren't told - or aren't able to tell - what the morals or dreams or ideals should be passed on because it can't fit into a sound bite or short story.
One of the hardest things about moving to a new town is finding a place to get a haircut. It is usually a case of the Goldilocks' porridge. It was no difference in my case.